|
David M. Borden is a retired Connecticut Supreme Court Justice. ==Judicial career== Justice Borden received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Amherst College in 1959 and his Bachelor of Laws degree from Harvard Law School in 1962. Upon graduating, he entered private practice in Hartford, Connecticut in 1962 and continued until 1977.〔(Biographies of Supreme Court Justices: Justice David M. Borden )〕 Justice Borden played an important role in reforming the Connecticut judiciary, serving as executive director of the Commission to Revise the Criminal Statutes of the State of Connecticut from 1963 to 1971 and as principal architect of the 1969 Connecticut Penal Code. Judge Borden also served as Chief Counsel to the Joint Committee on the Judiciary (of the State of Connecticut), as judge of the Court of Common Pleas from 1977 to 1978, and as judge of the Superior Court from 1978 to 1983. Additionally, he was president of the Connecticut Judges Association from 1981 to 1983. In 1983, following a reorganization of the Connecticut court system, Justice Borden became one of the six original judges of the Connecticut Appellate Court. Seven years later, in 1990, he was nominated to the Connecticut Supreme Court by Governor William A. O'Neill, a position he held until his retirement in 2007.〔(Ceremony Scheduled to Honor Justice Borden’s Last Day Sitting As An Associate Justice of the Connecticut Supreme Court )〕 Prior to his retirement, at the mandatory age of 70, Justice Borden was the Acting Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, following the resignation of Chief Justice Sullivan, who stepped down after it was revealed he delayed the release of an unpopular decision regarding the state's Freedom of Information Commission http://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR278/278CR144.pdf so that his chosen successor, Justice Zarrella, would be elevated to the Court's top position. As acting Chief Justice, Justice Borden formed the Public Access Task Force,(http://www.jud.ct.gov/external/news/PATF_remarks_052506.pdf ) composed of judges, journalists, and attorneys to develop recommendations to ensure the Court's openness.http://www.jud.ct.gov/external/news/press201.htm Chief Justice Borden accepted most of the Task Force's recommendations,(www.jud.ct.gov ) which have paved the way for an expanded transparency of court proceedings heretofore un-heard of in not only Connecticut, but in other state Supreme Courts. The Task Force was chaired by Justice Richard N. Palmer who co-authored with Chief Justice Borden a letter outlining their concerns about then-Chief Justice Sullivan's apparently deliberate decision to delay release of the FOI case, Clerk of GA7. Justice Borden authored a dissent in that opinion, joined by Justices Norcott and Katz http://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR278/278CR144E.pdf During his tenure as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, he chaired several committees charged with further revising the Connecticut penal system. From 1992 to 2001, he served as Chairperson of the Rules Committee of the Judges of the Superior Court. He was also Chairperson of the Connecticut Law Revision Commission Task Force which was responsible for codifying the Connecticut Law of Evidence. This codification was later adopted as Connecticut Evidence Code. In addition to his duties as a Connecticut jurist, Justice Borden teaches at the University of Connecticut School of Law and has co-authored three books: ''Connecticut Criminal Jury Instructions'', ''Superior Court Criminal Rules'', and ''Connecticut Criminal Law''. One notable decision Justice Borden authored was State v. Cobb (251 Conn. 285, 1999). There the Connecticut Supreme Court upheld Sedrick Cobb's death sentence for the 1989 sexual assault and murder of Julia Ashe in Waterbury against a total of forty-five challenges. The Connecticut Supreme Court also upheld the sentence despite Justice Robert I. Berdon's angry dissent where he made a revelation about the Court's conference-specifically, Justice Berdon claimed that the Court had failed to engage in its statutorily-mandated duty to determine if sentences were the product of untoward passion. Justice Borden was the author of State v. Ledbetter (275 Conn. 534, 881 A. 2d 290 (2005)), a landmark decision on eyewitness identification law in Connecticut. He became interested in eyewitness identification issues. In 2011, he became the Chair of the Connecticut Legislature's Eyewitness Identification Task Force 〔http://www.cga.ct.gov/jud/eyewitness/taskforce.asp〕 which supported the adoption of double-blind, sequential identification procedures, improved training, and statewide standards for identification procedures. On October 10, 2008, Bordon dissented in the case of Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public Health, in which the court held that gay and lesbian couples could not be denied the right to marry because of the Equal Protection Clause of the state constitution. This decision made Connecticut the third state (along with Massachusetts and California) to legalize same-sex marriage through judicial decree of the state supreme court. Justice Borden is currently a member of the Board of Directors of the Hartford Foundation for Public Giving, and screens criminal cases for transfer to the Supreme Court.〔http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:3L7nab3gU6kJ:www.marianireck.com/Customer-Content/WWW/CMS/files/GrandparentRights.pdf+judge+stoughton+and+justice+borden&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESjrtr2nHWTclwK1saMGCWCQJsOGtc28LQBPLsXZ1g1LPQDJnfBcM39TpyWTH6IEx8DlAb0LFXBF03C7BT6dCnLU8OItx42U_0GY-wJUw0wqThTWstuGtl-2uWKm9g3WYNopXdIg&sig=AHIEtbTxccCB33h7bbNGPuqRGkn95kQPig〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「David M. Borden」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|